Advertisements
Build
I’ll start with the build quality. Over the years I have been fortunate enough to use and own other high end photo equipment. I used to own a Canon 5D Mark IV as well as a Fuji X-Pro3 and have shot extensively with the flagships like the 1DX line. The SL series is a different breed of build. These machines are made to last. By no means are the likes of Canon, Nikon, Sony…you name it, badly built cameras, it’s more so that when you pick up an SL for the first time, you know you’re holding something special. I had the same feeling holding a 5D Mark III for the first time. That cold to touch feel, I’m sure a lot of photographers are familiar with. My X-Pro3 was a tank. Go anywhere, do anything type of machine. I’ve recently played around with the awesome Canon R5 as well, and that feels great. I have no doubt that any of these cameras could withstand the same level of abuse that an SL could.
However, when you hold an SL and comprehend how each part is hand assembled, it’s hard to go back to anything else! The body features an IP54 rating, and to save the geek talk, this will mean you can just about do anything and go anywhere with this beast. Spray it with a hose? No problem. Not that I’ve tested this but the bold boys down at Leica Store Miami have certainly done this! My initial justification for this build was “oh well of course it’s built like this, just look at the price”. I bought mine for £3,975. And while we could all go back and forth with production budgets and shipment quantities from bigger companies, when comparing this to the likes of the R5, that sells for £4,299. Oh, and let’s not forget the Sony A1…£6,499. Okay, okay not a fair example I know. The specs are nowhere near the same. But if we ignore that for a moment and only focus on build. The SL2-S is two thirds of the price of the A1 and features infinitely better build quality. I’ll circle back to this when comparing some of the SL’s features later.
Design
When studying Leica’s design language, I think it’s fair to say that the general consensus is that they’re absolutely stunning. Maybe that’s just my subjective opinion coming through! But they have to have done something right to inspire design gods like Jony Ive and Steve Jobs? While most adore the design of these cameras, the functionality of them is a more controversial topic. I could go on and on about why I love manual focus and rangefinders, but today, we’re talking SL. The SL2 introduced the 3 button layout to bring the SL series in line with the M10, Q2 and CL. Aesthetically, the SL2-S is almost identical to the SL2. The only change is that the lettering on the front of the body is now blacked out. A change that I welcome as a street photographer. I find the design is as simple as it is practical. The joystick is a dream to use, the same one they used even on the original Typ 601. Function buttons are all within reach and for my use, have more than enough features. If you’re used to a flagship Canon/Nikon, then this may restrict you. However, I found I can access all my focusing modes, focusing areas, ISO, WB, timer, PASM and WIFI settings all very easily. And if a button wasn’t set to it, the quick menu works great with the touchscreen. I also love the deeper indented grip they introduced on the SL2, given the weight of the body, this makes the ergonomics much better. And while I can rave all day about the build quality, it does result in a significant weight difference. The body is just under a kilo. Which is a lot, there’s no easy way of looking at it. And if I paired this with their native SL zooms or even their primes, this would be a real problem for me. This was a big reason why I moved away from my 5D Mark IV. I want a fast, light camera for my street photography. And I’ll explain how I achieve that very soon!
IQ
Image quality is in no way the biggest feature of a camera. There are at least a dozen aspects that come before this for me when I choose a camera. However, this is a big reason why I love and will continue to adore the SL2-S. Now, it’s easy to get confused, I’m not talking resolution here. Yes, it’s half the resolution of the SL2 and much lower compared to other high end cameras bodies, especially ones of this price. What I’m more concerned about is how the sensor performs with various lenses, old and new, and how it renders images. Leica’s chief lens designer, Peter Karbe, said once that “there are two cameras in the world best to use M lenses on – M and SL”. And I think that’s what I’m getting at here. I always used to adapt my M lenses onto my Fuji’s and while I was extremely happy with the results, it just wasn’t the same. Leica fit lenses (yes, even third party lenses) are designed for and around to work best on Leica sensors. The sensor architecture is delicate, functional and beautiful….and maybe a little outdated. Let me explain. My M-P Typ 240 from 2014 has a 35mm 24mp sensor, so far the same as the SL2-S right? However the technology at the time meant a sensor of this calibre, in a body of that design results on some shortcomings. Such as poor low light performance and slow image transfer. But I along with many others, even today in 2021, are prepared to look past this in light of the image renderings, colour and overall IQ. The lenses, even my old summicron 5cm dual range rigid from almost 70 years ago now, still work great on my SL2-S. It has character and feel, and a life to images that I just can’t obtain from any other camera system out there. And I understand how almost £4K for a 24mp camera is a lot! Especially now you can pick up a 20mp R6 with far superior AF for £2,599 or a Panasonic S1 with almost identical features for £1,799 or the smaller S5 for £100 less. You could even get a Panasonic S1R, almost identical again to the SL2 for only £2,799. Or maybe even the Sigma Fp L with EVF Kit, which has 60mp (higher than any camera mentioned here!) for £2,499…£1,476 less than the SL2-S! I want to preface this with, THE SL2-S IS NOT FOR EVERYONE! If you want specs, reliable autofocus and 3 million frames per second, go buy a Sony or any of these cameras mentioned prior. However, if you’re of the 0.0001% of photographers like me, who for god knows what reason, are obsessed by the feel and act of taking a photo, try the Leica SL2-S, or any Leica from the past 100 years. This is a company that loves photography, the cameras they build and better yet, the photographers who use them. I am in an unbelievably lucky and fortunate position where I can pair the SL2-S next to my M-P or even my film M6 and bounce from feel, to function while maintaining a high level of love and enjoyment for all our shared passion.
Colour
I promise not to go too deeply into the topic of colour and Leica as I know this is quite the notorious topic when it comes to these cameras. A topic that Leica fan boys and girls across the world use to justify spending (lets be honest here) way too much money on these machines. Why do I know this? Because I am one of these so-called Leica fan boys. So if you’re happy with the colour output from your camera, be it a Canon, Sony, Nikon, Panasonic…even that other one begging with “O”, then carry on scrolling and happy shooting! But for me, unless you’re shooting 3 stops overexposed Portra, they’re aren’t any better colours, tones and overall fidelity out there!
Low Light
I’ve been itching to talk about the low-light of this monster. Now, while we’ve seen a lot of 24mp sensors over the years, this is in a league of its own. A first for Leica, this is their first ever Back Side Illuminated sensor. So while the overall architecture is very similar to the Typ 601, the colour calibration and now the BSI, make this a significant upgrade. I’ve pushed the SL2-S way past 25,000 and onwards to 50,000 ISO while still getting very usable images. The processing power alongside this technology must be performing witch craft somewhere between the shutter button and SD card because I’ve never seen low light like this. I remember being blown away by the 1DX mark II and III, and equally with the A7S III, and while these are still incredible, they’re only 20 and 12mp – the SL2-S is 24. Is this a realistic measurement….no. Can you tell a difference at 6,400 or even 10,000 ISO…no. But, is it nice to know and feel safe with leaving the camera in auto ISO and never have to worry about another grainy or blurry photo ever again…absolutely. I set my auto ISO parameters to a max ISO of 50,000 and a minimum shutter speed of 1/250. That way I never have a blurry photo (especially with this IBIS) and I never have to worry about grain. Aperture priority, exposure compensation set to the rear dial, that’s it. Quick, easy and very dynamic. These are the settings I use on every camera. When I took the Sony A7R III on holiday, when I owned the X-Pro3 for travel and even when I shot weddings on my 5D Mark IV. Only difference now is that I don’t have the stress of a photo being too blurry or too grainy. And to quote Josh from Leica Store Miami “I’d rather have a grainy photo than a blurry photo I can’t use”.
AF
Remember when autofocus was only contrast detect back around 2016? Brilliant, now add fancy algorisms to make it 10% better. That’s how the AF performs on the SL2-S. Don’t get me wrong, its better than the SL2 (marginally), and much better than the 601. So for portraiture, landscape, editorial shoots, it’s great. And coming from my Ms, it is a dream. However, if you’re looking to do sports, compared to the likes of Sony, Canon Dual Pixel and Fuji, in my experience – forget it. Not to say that it can’t be done, I’ve seen some extraordinary sport photos taken on SL. Specifically when paired with 9fps burst and 25fps in electronic shutter. On paper, it looks amazing. In my experience, while I’m certainly no wildlife or sports photographer, I only found it to be adequate and usable rather than extraordinary. A note worth taking though, the native SL primes (with exception of the Summilux 50 SL) work much faster than their zooms. Notice on the image below how the 24-90 just missed focus on the deer walking towards me using AF-C and Field AF method.
Usability & Compared to M?
In conclusion, I’ve always loved the SLs and I love my SL2-S. They’ve had their quirks, but I feel they’ve been getting ironed out over the years through software updates, new lenses and alliances with Sigma and Panasonic. The price has almost halved since the 601 while competing brands have only ever gone up in price. The AF while still not perfect, has improved significantly. The low light went from outdated, even back in 2015, to the best I’ve ever seen. The battery life…well, there’s always room for improvement. I started this review saying how this is the camera to attract M shooters, and that’s exactly how I see this camera – a companion to the M. For me, I use this 99% of the time with M lenses. It makes the body smaller, lighter and believe it or not faster. The lower resolution while keeping up with that gorgeous, close to real-life EVF, makes for a manual focus experience I can only describe as M-Like. For when I want the moment, I will always gravitate to my M bodies. However, now when I look for the big detail photos I know an M just couldn’t keep up with, I trust the SL2-S to be right there alongside. Taking up no extra space, weight or time while delivering the best image quality for me at no extra expense for experience or enjoyment. If you’re an M shooter, digital or film, I urge you to try the SL2-S. Feel the build, look through the cinema screen of a viewfinder and try the manual focus experience.
About the Author
Ben W Webster is a street, portrait and travel photographer based in Sussex, UK. His style resembles reportage aesthetics following film-like tones and colour palettes. You can find more of his work on his website and Instagram. This article was also published here and shared with permission.
